Legal

19
Dec
2022

Former Senator Rod Culleton charge of assault – Withdrawn

Former Senator Rod Culleton charged with assault

Kojonup Police (WA) Constable Matt Johnson received a complaint from the Adelaide/Bendigo Bank agents, Mr. Terrance Kerr, known as the TAB man, claiming the former Senator, Rod Culleton assault him during the attempted theft of a farmers land almost three (3) months ago.

Update: The assault charge was withdrawn, just before very powerful evidence was to be presented by Rodney.

Terrence Kerr of Baycorp is the bailiff arguing with Culleton in the video above.

As a result, Rod Culleton has been charged with assault for defending the farmers property from the corrupt bankers, the bailiff and their accomplices, the WA Kojonup Police.

It’s a seven (7) year maximum gaol sentence for assault, and we all know this is purely about disqualifying Culleton from running in the next federal election under s44(ii) constitution.

“Disqualification; any person who; …for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer…”

Culleton fought off the bankers and the police for the farmer to remain on the property, where he continues to be in full possession of the farm today. The farmer, Mr. Wayne Manolini even harvested a successful cereal crop estimated to be worth over $800,000 unfettered.

Rod Culleton briefed his supporters today in a Facebook Live.

Posted by GAP in Legal
19
Dec
2022

Crimes against humanity

Crimes against humanity

Definition of crimes against humanity

  1. ‘Crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
  2. Murder;
  3. Extermination;
  4. Enslavement;
  5. Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
  6. Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
  7. Torture;
  8. Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
  9. Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, medical, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender or other grounds that are universally recognised as impermissible;
  10. Enforced disappearance of persons;
  11. The crime of apartheid;
  12. Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
  13. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
  14. ‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organisational policy to commit such attack;

Elements of crimes against humanity

Crimes against humanity do not need to be linked to armed conflict and can also occur in peacetime, similar to the crime of genocide. The definition of crimes against humanity contains the following main elements:

  1. A physical element, which includes the commission of “any of the following acts”:
  2. Murder;
  3. Extermination;
  4. Enslavement;
  5. Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
  6. Imprisonment;
  7. Torture;
  8. Grave forms of sexual violence;
  9. Persecution;
  10. Enforced disappearance of persons;
  11. The crime of apartheid;
  12. Other inhumane acts.
  13. A contextual element: “when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population”; and
  14. A mental element: “with knowledge of the attack”
Posted by GAP in Covid, Legal
27
Dec
2021

AEC and Government Solicitor threaten Great Australian Party with “quantum” fine

AEC and Government Solicitor threaten Great Australian Party with “quantum” fine

Under the title “Authorisation requirements under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth),” the Australian Government Solicitors have issued the Great Australian Party with a warning letter claiming they are being “instructed to act for the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)“.

Point 3 of the letter stated:

Each time the unauthorised electoral matter is viewed, the notifying entity (in this case the GAP) may be liable to pay a civil penalty up to $26,640. That is, each time the unauthorised post and/or page is viewed, a penalty of $26,640 can be imposed. For example, we note that the GAP Facebook page has 111,000 followers and has attracted 510 reviews. Depending on the number of times the unauthorised electoral matter on the Facebook page has been viewed, you might be liable for a very significant civil penalty, the precise quantum of which will not be known until the concerns raised by the AEC have been addressed (that is the posts and/or page have been authorised in compliance with the Act).

Furthermore, the Australian Government Solicitors spent Christmas Eve trolling and taking screen shots of the Great Australian Party Facebook Page and emailed a further two (2) “unauthorised” posts they found. We’re not sure if the AEC has given a party this much attention in their entire existence, begging the question is this even normal behaviour?

The letter was signed off by Matthew Blunn

National Leader AGS Dispute Resolution

T 02 6253 7424 M 0407 464 028

matthew.blunn@ags.gov.au

Posted by GAP in Constitution, Covid, Legal
27
Dec
2021

AEC places federal election into jeopardy by disallowing unvaccinated scrutineers

AEC places federal election into jeopardy by disallowing unvaccinated scrutineers

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) have responded to an enquiry from one of our members by informing them they must be “fully vaccinated” to scrutineer for the upcoming federal election.

As per our constitution, s 41 gives people the right to elect their own representatives. By the AEC disallowing electors the right to maintain the integrity of their vote, they are interfering in the democratic process that could see a potential fraudulent election occur.

The Great Australian Party sees this as a threat to the checks and balances of a free, fair and open democratic election, not to mention discriminatory.

Australia has a long history of apartheid, discrimination and segregation, and the AEC is proudly choosing to continue that tradition in the next federal election.

The Former Senator of the 45th Parliament, Rod Culleton said today that Australia is increasingly becoming a dictatorship, where the two major parties are making it extremely difficult to remove them from power, something our constitution could not foresee.

Mr. Culleton also went on to ask what the logic was behind allowing people to gather to cast their vote, but not to protect their vote.

Posted by GAP in Constitution, Covid, Legal
24
Dec
2021

Letter of response to a workplace direction to vaccinate

Letter of response to a workplace direction to vaccinate

Former Senator Rod Culleton has drafted a template letter that may assist in preserving an individual’s right to employment.

Culleton said today he would help offer remedy to individuals being coerced into receiving a medical procedure to keep their employment.

Rod Culleton explains the letter of response

Tim Dwyer explains further

Below is a list of template letters by State. Download the applicable template letter to your State.

Western Australia

Queensland

Northern Territory

South Australia

New South Wales
Victoria

Australian Capital Territory

Tasmania

Sources:

s 162(1) Public Health Act 2016 (WA)
s 203(2) Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (VIC)
s 362D Public Health Act 2005 (QLD)
s 120(4) Public Health Act 1997 (ACT)
s 101(2) Emergency Management Act 2013 (NT)
s 81 South Australian Public Health Act 2011 (SA)
s 10 Public Health Act 2010 (NSW)
s 242(1) Work Health and Safety Act 2012 (TAS)
George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; 170 CLR 104; 64 ALJR 384; 93 ALR 483; 48 A Crim R 246
High Court unanimously holds that Queensland Rail is a trading corporation within the
meaning of s 51(xx) of the Constitution
s2 Constitution Act 1889 (WA)
Corporations (Commonwealth Powers) Act 2001
s 118 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
Stay of the Emergency Temporary Standard Requiring Mandatory Vaccines or Testing for All Employers (US)
Emergency Temporary Standard Stayed by Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (US)

*Not to be taken as legal advice, just good advice.

Authorised by Ian Nelson for the Great Australian Party, 65 Cardinal Cct, Caboolture, 4510

Posted by GAP in Covid, Legal
16
Dec
2021

Japanese Government sets gold standard for human rights

Japanese Government sets gold standard for human rights

The Japanese Government have embraced human rights by allowing its citizens to make their own well informed choices when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine. They will not be forcing or coercing citizens, and they have asked others to respect peoples individual medical choices by not discriminating.

The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is a cabinet level ministry of the Japanese government. On their website under COVID-19 vaccine information, it states the following:

Consent to vaccination

Although we encourage all citizens to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, it is not compulsory or mandatory. Vaccination will be given only with the consent of the person to be vaccinated after the information provided. Please get vaccinated of your own decision, understanding both the effectiveness in preventing infectious diseases and the risk of side effects. No vaccination will be given without consent. Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be vaccinated, and do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated.

Historically, Australia’s most notorious human rights abusers – both Federal and State Governments – are continuing to strip people of their jobs, lives, families, freedom, rights, wealth, home and basically anything they can use to coerce people into taking the vaccine.

Posted by GAP in Covid, Legal
15
Dec
2021

Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Question: Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Answer: Yes you can, and we encourage you to do so.

Section 206 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 states that all voters must be supplied with a pencil when voting in a polling booth, but there’s nothing preventing you from bringing your own pen and using it instead.

Posted by GAP in Legal